There was a time when three researchers designed a study to see if using a doodle-book training program could enhance kids’ creativity and original thinking.
They used two tests to measure 67 kids’ creativity before and after going through the program. Their study showed that it could be done.
Dorota Dziedziewicz, Dorota Oledzka, Maciej Karwowski, Developing 4- to 6-year-old children's figural creativity using a doodle-book program, Thinking Skills and Creativity, Volume 9, 2013, Pages 85-95, ISSN 1871-1871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.004. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187112000764)
Abstract:
This study investigates the effects of a doodle-book program intervention on creative imagination and divergent thinking on figural material of 4- to 6-year-old children.
A total of 67 children participated in the intervention, using a program entitled Creative Doodle: The Adventures of Dragonfly Grazka, and 61 children formed the control group. Figural creativity tests (Franck Drawing Completion Test and Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking) were used in pretest and posttest measurement. The intervention was found to be effective in developing participants’ imagination and their fluency and originality of thinking. Results are discussed in the context of possibilities and limitations of the stimulation of creative abilities, especially in early childhood, as well as the advantages of doodle-books as creativity-enhancing methods among children.
Keywords: Effectiveness of creativity development programs; Divergent thinking; Creative imagination; Doodle-books
A study published in 2017 found that doodling, coloring and free drawing could make participants feel like their problem-solving skills had improved.
So…maybe do some doodling to improve self-belief or don’t in case it backfires?
More important, all of these three actions activated the reward pathways in the brain. This was true for artists and non-artists and it took only 3 minutes to happen.
The researchers believe that if the results of this pilot study are applicable to more people, then any one of these three actions—coloring, doodling or free drawing—could be used to change addictive habits which also engage the reward pathways of the brain.
So…if you are trying to change the number of cookies you eat maybe doodle before you eat that extra cookie?
Girija Kaimal, Hasan Ayaz, Joanna Herres, Rebekka Dieterich-Hartwell, Bindal Makwana, Donna H. Kaiser, Jennifer A. Nasser, Functional near-infrared spectroscopy assessment of reward perception based on visual self-expression: Coloring, doodling, and free drawing, The Arts in Psychotherapy, Volume 55, 2017, Pages 85-92, ISSN 0197-4556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2017.05.004. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019745561630171X)
Visual self-expression helps with attention and improves health and well-being. Few studies have examined reward pathway activation during different visual art tasks.
This pilot study is the first to examine brain activation via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during three distinct drawing tasks—coloring, doodling, and free drawing. Participants (11 men, 15 women; 8 artists, 16 non-artists) engaged in each task separated by equal intervals of rest in a block design experimental protocol.
Additional data included a pre- and post survey of self-perceptions of creativity, prior experience with drawing tasks, and reflections on study participation. Overall, the three visual arts tasks resulted in significant activation of the medial prefrontal cortex compared to the rest conditions.
The doodling condition resulted in maximum activation of the medial prefrontal cortex compared to coloring and free drawing; however, differences between the drawing conditions were not statistically significant.
Emergent differences were seen between artists and non-artists for coloring and doodling. All three visual self-expression tasks activated the medial prefrontal cortex, indicating potential clinical applications of reward perception through art making.
Participants improved in their self-perceptions of problem solving and having good ideas. Participants found the drawing tasks relaxing but wanted more time per task.
Further study with varied art media and longer time on tasks are needed to determine potential interactions between participants’ backgrounds and reward activation.
Keywords: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS); Drawing; Coloring; Doodling; Reward perception; Adults; Artists; Non-artists
Based on one study, which asked 100 people why they doodle, the answer is: for many reasons.
Specifically, people used doodling for:
Doodling: A Positive Creative Leisure Practice, Priyanka Baweja https://www.academia.edu/68667665/Doodling_A_Positive_Creative_Leisure_Practice?auto=citations&from=cover_page
One study found that doodling activities such as outlining, coloring and free-drawing can train children’s fine motor skills.
A more intriguing finding of the same study was that doodlers inserted their emotions in their doodles. Then these emotionally-charged images could be used to create simple stories. This chain of events indirectly helped the doodlers’ skill to think in writing sentences.
In sum, doodling helped the practitioners to train their motor and narrative writing skills.
Implementation of Doodling Technique in Teaching Writing to the Slow Learners, Balqis Husain1*, Saifudin S. Adam https://www.academia.edu/62520572/Implementation_of_Doodling_Technique_in_Teaching_Writing_to_the_Slow_Learners
This review is from the year 2016. It claims that doodling holds a special place in scientists’ hearts. Why would such an absentminded task, a task that some would attribute to boredom, interest the curious minds of scientists? Because scientists believe that doodling may be a way to examine the subconscious mind.
What does research have to say about doodling? It’s not an act of boredom. On the contrary, it helps with memory and recall.
Does doodling create a distraction thus impairing learning or does it minimize daydreaming and as a consequence increase concentration?
One study mentioned in the review had two groups of people listen to a conversation about the names of partygoers. One group was asked to shade pre-made squares and circles. The other group only listened to the conversation without doing anything else (that we know of…).
The doodling group recalled partygoers’ names better by 29% compared to the group that only listened.
Why? The scientists hypothesized that doodling was such a simple task that it did not turn the doodlers’ attention away from listening to the conversation about partygoers’ names. They also believed that doodling may had helped the doodlers maintain interest in the conversation, which in turn helped them remember more names.
So next time you find yourself straining to maintain attention during an important (auditory) task which cannot be postponed maybe you should try doodling.
Doodling: The artistry of the roving metaphysical mind, Sharat Gupta https://jmhhb.org/article.asp?issn=0971-8990;year=2016;volume=21;issue=1;spage=16;epage=19;aulast=Gupta
Remember that study which claimed that doodling helps with memory recall? If that study got you excited it’s time for this next one to let you down.
In this study mentioned in the same review, another scientist had one group of people doodle while a PowerPoint presentation was bombarding the participants with images. The other group simply watched the image-heavy presentation.
Guess who recalled better the images they’d seen during that PowerPoint presentation. It was the group that simply watched.
The scientists hypothesized that the two tasks, doodling and looking at images, competed with one another since both required the same cognitive resources (visual pathway neurons). Doodling in this case may have forced the doodlers to divide their attention between the two tasks, which in turn meant they had less time to look at the images.
In short, less attention and less time spent looking at the images meant worse performance when asked to recall those same images.
Yes you can, based on this one review anyway.
According to the review, although fun spaces with slides, swings, and funny-shaped windows look like maybe they can help enhance employees' creativity there’s no proof that they do.
Doodle spaces on the other hand…well, they can be used by employees to think about issues they are stuck on and to interact with others beyond their own team. These interactions are good because the employees can exchange valuable information and experiences.
But a more interesting observation in this review comes from Hoff and Öberg (2015). These scientists claim that doodle spaces which are fun, meaning equipped with inspiring objects such as toys (something you would find in those fun spaces mentioned above) do indeed increase creativity.
So fun spaces possibly don’t make employees more creative but fun doodle spaces do?
Why? The review claims that the employees in the doodle spaces interact with these inspiring objects at the same time they are talking and thinking.
Perhaps it has something to do with intention, justputaneyeonit.com theorizes. Doodle spaces can be fun like fun spaces are, but employees don’t go there to forget and have fun. They go there to let their minds wander.
Meinel, Martin and Maier, Lukas and Wagner, Timm and Voigt, Kai-Ingo, Designing Creativity-Enhancing Workspaces: A Critical Look at Empirical Evidence (2017). Journal of Technology and Innovation Management 1(1), 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3051058
In this study the scientists sought to find out the relationship between a sketch’s quality and the perceived creativity of the concept the sketch tried to present.
They explored this relationship by having four people of varying drawing abilities sketch toaster ideas. In total, they used four different toaster concepts each one drawn in a very low quality, low quality, quality and high-quality sketch.
And so which concept did people find more creative? The concept that was sketched the best.
Thus, the scientists concluded that sketching quality is important when judging the creativity of an idea and so how an idea is presented is important.
Just Put An Eye On It! liked the doodle toaster idea which was about a toaster you can doodle on one side and have your doodle imprinted on the bread.
Barry Kudrowitz, Paula Te and David Wallace (2012). The influence of sketch quality on perception of product idea creativity. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing,26, pp 267-279 doi:10.1017/S0890060412000145
Follow to get posts about the art world, animation news and job postings, drawing lesson links and company updates. Share with #justputaneyeonit
Follow to get interesting retweets about art, drawing, sketching and coloring. Share with #justputaneyeonit
Share with #justputaneyeonit
Feedback and any inquiries are just an email away.